ASCE will be sunsetting the Civil Engineering Database (CEDB) in the coming months. We encourage you to start using the ASCE Library to perform content searches. In the ASCE Library, you can save your search results as well as receive email content alerts when new content relevant to your area of interest is published. Try it out today at https://ascelibrary.org.

 

Who Pays for the Unexpected in Construction

by Ron Gibson, GeoGrout Inc, Pennsauken, United States,



Document Type: Proceeding Paper

Part of: Preparing for Construction in the 21st Century

Abstract:

A grouting contractor's point of view on who pays for the unexpected in construction is presented. Because grouting can be used as an alternative for other construction procedures, the grouting procedures have to be tailored to the particular construction problem and ground conditions. The specifications have to be flexible enough to permit the procedures and mixes to be changed to treat the conditions actually encountered. For the grouting contractor, the problems of the unexpected are almost diametrically opposite to those of the General Contractor, because problems are presumed to be unexpected. Eventually, the Owner has to pay for the unexpected in grouting. In general, disputes and claims can be minimized idf we recognize the inevitability of the unexpected and write contract procedures and specifications to allow for changes when warranted.

Subject Headings: Grouting | Contracts and subcontracts | Construction management | Risk management | Owners | Permits | Liability

Services: Buy this book/Buy this article

 

Return to search