Comparison of Two Methods of Screening Bridges for Scourby David S. Hunter, Ebasco Infrastructure, New York, United States,
Mark A. Hixson, Ebasco Infrastructure, New York, United States,
Salim M. Baig, Ebasco Infrastructure, New York, United States,
Abstract: Scour evaluations were performed for large numbers of bridges in two separate studies in New York and New Jersey. The two studies used different screening methods for identifying high-priority bridges; the New York bridges were then subjected to detailed studies. In this paper, the two methods are evaluated by applying the New Jersey method to the New York bridges, and then comparing the rankings with the scour-critical determinations.
Subject Headings: Scour | Comparative studies | Bridges | Highway bridges | Bridge tests | Structural analysis | Inspection | North America | United States | New York | New Jersey
Services: Buy this book/Buy this article
Return to search