ASCE will be sunsetting the Civil Engineering Database (CEDB) in the coming months. We encourage you to start using the ASCE Library to perform content searches. In the ASCE Library, you can save your search results as well as receive email content alerts when new content relevant to your area of interest is published. Try it out today at https://ascelibrary.org.

 

A CM Multiple Contracting Cost Model

by C. Edwin Haltenhoff, Michigan Technological Univ, Houghton, MI, USA,



Document Type: Proceeding Paper

Part of: Construction Management: A State-of-the-Art Update

Abstract:

The original purpose for construction management was cost savings through time savings and efficient operations. As the CM system expanded in use and scope of services other very significant benefits emerged. Controversy persists over the economics of the CM system as compared to the general contracting system. CM advocates claim the system has an undisputed logic that extracts maximum economic benefits. GC advocates claim their system of bidding through a general contractor produces the lowest possible price for the project. The opportunity to bid and construct side by side identical projects using both systems will probably not occur, allowing the controversy to continue. This paper supports the economic advantages of CM when a multiple contracting format is utilized. The support is based on actual data collected during the bidding of multiple contract CM projects in the State of Michigan.

Subject Headings: Contracts and subcontracts | Construction management | Economic factors | Bids | Project management | Construction costs | Claims | Michigan | United States

Services: Buy this book/Buy this article

 

Return to search