ASCE will be sunsetting the Civil Engineering Database (CEDB) in the coming months. We encourage you to start using the ASCE Library to perform content searches. In the ASCE Library, you can save your search results as well as receive email content alerts when new content relevant to your area of interest is published. Try it out today at https://ascelibrary.org.

 

DSM Saves the Dam

by Andrew D. Walker, Senior Project Manager; Nicholson Construction Company, P.O. Box 98, Bridgeville, PA 15017,


Serial Information: Civil Engineering—ASCE, 1994, Vol. 64, Issue 12, Pg. 48-51


Document Type: Feature article

Abstract:

The Miami Conservancy District built five flood control dams after the catastrophic flood of 1913 in Dayton, Ohio. Lockington Dam was one of these five hydraulic fill structures. The Ohio State Department of Natural Resources (ODNR) issued new regulations in 1981 requiring that design flood for class I dams be considered equal to the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF). Flood routing studies performed for the PMF calculated inflow indicated that the reservoir rose to the crest of the dam. Therefore, the existing dam core required extending to the crest level to maintain dam safety. The extension was constructed using a deep soil mix soil cement cutoff wall. This paper will describe the cutoff wall from conceptual design through to construction, including alternates considered, construction methods and data obtained, both prior to and during construction. While Deep Soil Mixing (DSM) has been used on contaminated sites as a method of containment and for dam foundations to decrease the risk of liquefaction, Lockington Dam represents one of the first applications as a conventional cutoff on an existing dam.

Subject Headings: Soil mixing | Locks (dam) | Floods | Dams | Dam foundations | Construction methods | Soil cement

Services: Buy this book/Buy this article

 

Return to search