ASCE will be sunsetting the Civil Engineering Database (CEDB) in the coming months. We encourage you to start using the ASCE Library to perform content searches. In the ASCE Library, you can save your search results as well as receive email content alerts when new content relevant to your area of interest is published. Try it out today at https://ascelibrary.org.

 

Intrastate and Interstate Water Transfers

by Dean T. Massey, Univ of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA,



Document Type: Proceeding Paper

Part of: Water Forum '86: World Water Issues in Evolution

Abstract:

Riparian states generally do not permit transfers of water outside the watershed of origin, while the opposite is true in the appropriation states provided there is no harm to existing appropriators. The three mechanisms utilized to apportion interstate water are interstate compacts approved by Congress, judicial allocation and legislative allocation. Interstate litigation results when states have failed to negotiate an apportionment among themselves. Courts use a judicial decree to allocate the disputed interstate water among contesting states by applying the 'equitable apportionment' doctrine. Congressional apportionment has been used once to apportion water in the lower Colorado River basin. The federal government may preempt existing state control over water rights for matters concerning interstate commerce, navigation and the development of federal projects.

Subject Headings: Water rights | Water resources | Water policy | Litigation | Legislation | Federal government | Riparian water | Colorado River

Services: Buy this book/Buy this article

 

Return to search