Documenting Design-Build

by William Gurry, (M.ASCE), Pres.; Gurry & Associates, Inc., Atlanta, GA,


Serial Information: Civil Engineering—ASCE, 1995, Vol. 65, Issue 9, Pg. 47-49


Document Type: Feature article

Abstract:

For engineers more familiar with the traditional design�bid�build process, design�build might present some unforeseen risks and responsibilities. To define and allocate these, the Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee offers a family of standard contract documents that provide a clear and structured guide to the process. Proponents of design�build value it as a method of delivering completed projects faster and cheaper than the traditional design�bid�build method. In teaming the architect/engineer with the contractor, communication between the two improves, and more ideas are brought into the process. But design�build often creates roles and responsibilities for owners, engineers and contractors not found in the traditional design�bid�build project�delivery system. Until now, engineers have had to create contract documents for design�build projects on a case�by�case basis. Earlier this year, the Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee (EJCDC) completed a family of standard design�build contract documents that define the responsibilities and allocate the risks involved. The documents address issues such as the design�builder selection process, preparation of the request for proposal, scope definition, standards of care, warranties and guarantees, geotechnical investigations, quality and communications.

Subject Headings: Design-build | Contract documentation | Project management | Design-bid-build | Joints | Contracts and subcontracts | Value engineering

Services: Buy this book/Buy this article

 

Return to search