Drained Residual Strength of Cohesive Soils
by Timothy D. Stark, A.M.ASCE, (Asst. Prof. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Illinois, Newmark Civ. Engrg. Lab. MC250, 205 N. Mathews Ave., Urbana, IL 618012352) and Hisham T. Eid, S.M.ASCE, (Grad. Res. Asst. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801)
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 120, No. 5, May 1994, pp. 856871, (doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)07339410(1994)120:5(856))
Access full text Permissions for Reuse
Document type: 
Journal Paper 
Discussion: 
by Robert W. Day (See full record)

Discussion: 
by Milan Maksimovic (See full record)

Closure:  (See full record)

Abstract: 
Results of torsional ring shear tests on cohesive soils reveal that the drained residual strength is related to the type of clay mineral and quantity of claysize particles. The liquid limit is used as an indicator of clay mineralogy, and the claysize fraction indicates quantity of particles smaller than 0.002 mm. Therefore, increasing the liquid limit and claysize fraction decreases the drained residual strength. The ring shear tests also reveal that the drained residual failure envelope is nonlinear, and the nonlinearity is sigificant for cohesive soils with a claysize fraction greater than 50% and a liquid limit between 60% and 220%. This nonlinearity should be incorporated into stability analyses. An empirical correlation for residual friction angle is described that is a function of liquid limit, claysize fraction, and effective normal stress. Previous residual strength correlations are based on only one soil index property and provide a residual friction angle that is independent of effective normal stress. For slope stability analyses, it is recommended that the residual strength be modeled using the entire nonlinear residual strength envelope or a residual friction angle that corresponds to the average effective normal stress on the slip surface. 
