American Society of Civil Engineers


Model of Nearshore Waves and Wave-Induced Currents around a Detached Breakwater


by Pham Thanh Nam, (corresponding author), (Doctoral student, Dept. of Water Resources Engineering, Lund Univ., Box 118, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden; and, Researcher, Center for Marine Environment, Research and Consultation, Institute of Mechanics, Vietnamese Academy of Science and Technology, 264 Doi Can, Hanoi, Vietnam E-mail: thanh_nam.pham@tvrl.lth.se) and Magnus Larson, (Professor, Dept. of Water Resources Engineering, Lund Univ., Box 118, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden. E-mail: magnus.larson@tvrl.lth.se)

Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, Vol. 136, No. 3, May/June 2010, pp. 156-176, (doi:  http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000038)

     Access full text
     Purchase Subscription
     Permissions for Reuse  

Document type: Journal Paper
Abstract: A numerical model that combines a random wave transformation and a wave-induced current model was developed in order to predict the wave and current fields around a detached breakwater. The wave field was determined using the EBED model, as reported by Mase in 2001, with a modified energy dissipation term. The surface roller associated with wave breaking was modeled based on a modification of the equations in works by Dally and Brown, and Larson and Kraus, in which the term for the roller energy flux in the alongshore direction was added to the energy balance equation. The nearshore currents and water elevation were determined from the continuity equation together with the depth-averaged momentum equations. The model was validated by three unique high-quality data sets obtained during experiments on detached breakwaters in the large-scale sediment transport facility basin at the Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory in Vicksburg, Miss. The calculated significant wave height and longshore current were in good agreement with these measurements, whereas the cross-shore current was underestimated because undertow processes were not included in the modeling (depth-averaged equations employed). The calculated wave setup was somewhat overestimated; however, the absolute differences between the calculations and measurements were overall relatively small.


ASCE Subject Headings:
Breaking waves
Surf zones
Hydrodynamics
Nearshore
Water circulation
Breakwaters

Author Keywords:
Breaking waves
Surf zone
Hydrodynamics
Nearshore circulation
Breakwaters