American Society of Civil Engineers


Use of SPT Blow Counts to Estimate Shear Strength Properties of Soils: Energy Balance Approach


by Hiroshan Hettiarachchi, (corresponding author), (Asst. Prof., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Lawrence Technol. Univ., 21000 West Ten Mile Rd., Southfield, MI 48075 E-mail: hiroshan@ltu.edu) and Timothy Brown, (Geotech. Engr., Patrick Energy Services, 19500 Victor Pkwy., Ste. 300, Livonia, MI 48152)

Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 135, No. 6, June 2009, pp. 830-834, (doi:  http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000016)

     Access full text
     Purchase Subscription
     Permissions for Reuse  

Document type: Technical Note
Discussion: by Fernando Schnaid E-mail: farnando@ufrgs.br and et al.    (See full record)
Closure:(See full record)
Errata:(See full record)
Abstract: In foundation designs, standard penetration test (SPT) blow counts are typically used to estimate shear strength properties of soils. Few correlations are widely in use to make such estimations. However, the selection of these correlation equations are not often justified or explained. This manuscript describes a new approach to estimate the shear strength properties based on the SPT blow counts. The proposed method treats SPT analogous to driving a miniature open-ended pipe pile. During SPT, part of the energy is transferred into the soil. This energy is dissipated at the soil-sampler interface to overcome skin and point resistance to penetrate a sampler into the soil. Energy balance was used to correlate the SPT blow count to the shear strength properties of the soil at the depth of testing. Two separate equations were derived: one to estimate the friction angle (Φ′) of sand and the other to estimate the undrained shear strength (cu) of clay. SPT results from two sites were used to calibrate the proposed equations, and then two other sets of data were used to verify them. With a low average standard deviation in the calibration process, the proposed N60 — Φ′ equation demonstrated a strong correlation. The proposed N60cu equation did not provide as strong a correlation as the N60 — Φ′ equation. However, a statistical analysis revealed that for the data used in this research, both equations could estimate shear strength properties better than the commonly used, other existing correlations. The proposed equations may not work in very stiff clay or very dense sand and should not be used to analyze SPT results with poor recovery.


ASCE Subject Headings:
Design
Energy
Foundations
Friction
Penetration tests
Shear strength