American Society of Civil Engineers


A Whole Building Cost Perspective to Floor Vibration Serviceability


by Linda M. Hanagan, Ph.D., P.E., (Associate Professor, Department of Architectural Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802) and Melissa C. Chattoraj, (Project engineer, THP Limited, Inc., Cincinnati, OH 45202)
Section: Structural Design of Buildings for Serviceability, pp. 1-6, (doi:  http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/40798(190)37)

     Access full text
     Purchase Subscription
     Permissions for Reuse  

Document type: Conference Proceeding Paper
Part of: AEI 2006: Building Integration Solutions
Abstract: When selecting between lightweight steel joist floor systems and heavier composite or non-composite systems using rolled steel beams, two issues are generally considered to be in competition. These two considerations are cost and vibration serviceability. In general, it is thought that even though the joist floor is more prone to disturbing vibration levels, it is sometimes a better choice based on economy. This paper explores a whole building cost approach to assessing the economy of the lighter joist system relative to its rolled beam competitor. It is illustrated that other building systems, such as fire protection, are affected by the selection of the floor system, thus affecting total building cost. The end result is a closing of the cost gap between heavier rolled beam floors and lighter joist floors.


ASCE Subject Headings:
Vibration
Serviceability
Costs
Steel beams
Floors