Attitudes of the Knowledgeable Toward the Transportation of Spent Fuelby V. L. Paquet, Virginia Polytechnic Inst and State, Univ, Blacksburg, United States,
D. L. Price, Virginia Polytechnic Inst and State, Univ, Blacksburg, United States,
Document Type: Proceeding Paper
Part of: High Level Radioactive Waste Management 1993
Abstract: The purpose of the paper is to discuss the recent data analysis of a mail-in survey which investigated the attitudes of people having some knowledge of the nuclear industry. The survey contained 74 items which solicited 4 major types of information. Thirty-seven items investigated respondents' perception of risk concerning spent fuel transportation, 12 examined respondents' confidence in certain governing agencies' of managing the safe transportation of spent fuel, 19 examined respondents' attitudes toward certain special precautionary actions for spent fuel transport, and 6 requested demographic data. The 637 people who responded to the survey were divided into 5 mutually exclusive groups for analysis. These included: safety professionals, government employees of the nuclear industry, employees of environmental organizations, and Native Americans. The safety, government, and Native American groups were divided into subgroups for further analysis. Overall and group responses concerned with special precautionary actions for the transportation of spent fuel were examined. Native American, safety, and government subgroup responses to items which examined respondents' perceived risks, confidence in certain governing agencies, and attitudes concerning special precautionary actions for the transportation of spent fuel were also investigated. Additionally, risk perceptions of spent fuel transport was compared between people residing no more than 5 miles from an interstate highway to those living no less than 16 miles from an interstate highway. The results of the analysis are divided into 4 sections: A. Sample Identification; B. Overall and Group Attitudes to Certain Special Precautionary Actions for Transporting Spent Fuel; C. Subgroup Attitudes toward the Transportation of Spent Fuel; D. Risk Perceptions of People Living No More than 5 Miles vs. People Living No Less than 16 Miles from an Interstate Highway. Generally conclusions from the analysis are also provided in the paper.
Subject Headings: Fuels | Nuclear power | Risk management | Highways and roads | Transportation safety | Government | Employees | Public policy
Services: Buy this book/Buy this article
Return to search