Underground Buildings Save EnergySerial Information: Civil Engineering—ASCE, 1979, Vol. 49, Issue 5, Pg. 80-85
Document Type: Feature article
Errata: (See full record)
While properly designed underground buildings use less energy for heating and cooling, that's not always the reason they're underground. For example, San Francisco's voters demanded a convention center be underground so as not to become a barrier — adding $20,000,000 to construction costs. And in Washington, D.C., Georgetown University had no place to build a new recreation facility but under the football field. Buildings covered with earth, though not necessarily underground, can also save energy. Boise, Idaho's Amity School is expected to use about 70% less energy than its above-ground counterpart. These case histories and others — an underground library at the University of Michigan and a new state office building in California — illustrate some aspects of underground construction, energy conservation and the preservation of open space.
Subject Headings: Energy efficiency | Underground construction | Building design | Colleges and universities | Commercial buildings | Public buildings | Case studies | Recreational facilities | Idaho | North America | Boise | United States
Services: Buy this book/Buy this article
Return to search