American Engineering Unionsby Hatim M. Hajj, (A.M.ASCE), Trans. Planning Engr.; Harland Bartholomew & Assocs., Memphis, TN,
Serial Information: Engineering Issues: Journal of Professional Activities, 1973, Vol. 99, Issue 2, Pg. 213-221
Document Type: Journal Paper
Despite recent union setbacks, the engineering profession continues to be a top priority target of union organizers. Several forces could lead to more unionization among engineers: (1) long-run relative decline of blue-collar employment; (2) rapid change in technology and the related emergence of the big employers; (3) pro-labor government policies; (4) increasing union effort and sophistication in white-collar unionization; (5) gains in negotiated wages and fringe benefits in blue-collar and unionized white-collar situations; and (6) a general trend to group identification, as opposed to individual achievement. These trends are offset by: (1) engineering unions' inability to reconcile professionalism and unionism; (2) favorable market conditions for engineers; (3) engineers' conception of themselves as part of management; (4) continued anti-union activity of professional societies; and (5) offers of better jobs by management. The extent of unionization among American engineers will depend upon the outcome of these competing forces.
Subject Headings: Employee compensation and benefits | Public policy | Professional societies | Professional activities
Services: Buy this book/Buy this article
Return to search