Model Tests for Plastic Response of Lined Tunnelsby Timothy C. Kennedy, Asst. Prof.; Dept. of Mech. Engrg., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, Oreg.; formerly, Research Engr., Stanford Research Inst., Menlo Park, Calif.,
Herbert E. Lindberg, Staff Scientist; Stanford Research Inst., Menlo Park, Calif.,
Serial Information: Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 1978, Vol. 104, Issue 2, Pg. 399-420
Document Type: Journal Paper
Static isotropic and uniaxial strain loading tests were performed on models in a rock simulant having an unconfined compressive strength of about 4,300 psi (29.7 MN/m²) and a friction angle of 33°. The liners consisted of direct-contact steel tubes of three different radius-to-thickness ratios (a/h=50, 25, 12.5). In the isotropic loading experiments, the load-deformation relationship for the liners was in good agreement with theoretical curves from an elastic-plastic analysis and showed substantial increase in strength with increasing liner thickness. At the higher loads, the a/h=50 and a/h=25 liners buckled, and the deformations became larger than predicted by the theory. The a/h=12.5 liner did not buckle, even at tunnel closures of 5%. Similar behavior was found in uniaxial strain loading experiments, but 30% to 50% less load was required to cause 5% tunnel closure than under isotropic loading.
Subject Headings: Model tests | Tunnels | Load factors | Plastics | Linings | Material tests | Load tests | Isotropy | Strain | Compressive strength | Thickness
Services: Buy this book/Buy this article
Return to search