Nuclear Power Plant Cooling System Selectionby Stephen C. Ko, (A.M.ASCE), Head Siting Engr.; Kaiser Engrs., Oakland, Calif.,
Serial Information: Journal of the Power Division, 1975, Vol. 101, Issue 1, Pg. 55-67
Document Type: Journal Paper
Abstract: A method of cost-effectiveness was used to identify the best cooling system for a 4,400-MW nuclear power plant. Three alternative cooling systems were analyzed: (1) Recirculating cooling pond, (2) recirculating spray channel, and (3) a combination of spray channel and cooling pond. Each of the three alternative cooling systems were evaluated and analyzed against a set of criteria to satisfy the goal of minimal environmental impact, least economic expenditure, and maximized cooling efficiency. Pitfalls of making a biased endorsement of a system were examined using a sensitivity analysis. The cost-effectiveness approach utilized in this study does not rely on weighting and ranking which are common practices of other approaches in evaluation of alternative systems. The pitfalls and fallacies of weighting and ranking are presented.
Subject Headings: Cooling (wastewater treatment) | Temperature effects | Power plants | Sensitivity analysis | Nuclear power | System analysis | Water circulation | Ponds |
Services: Buy this book/Buy this article
Return to search