Elastic Versus Plastic Optimal Strength Designby George I.N. Rozvany, (F.ASCE),
Serial Information: Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 1977, Vol. 103, Issue 1, Pg. 210-215
Document Type: Journal Paper
Errata: (See full record)
Abstract: The aim of this note is to extend the Prager-Shield cost-gradient method from optimal plastic design to optimal elastic permissible stress design. It is shown in the context of beams having a constrained depth that, in general, optimal elastic strength designs are not ..fully stressed.. if hinges are not permitted. However, the minimum cost solution may be obtained if: for fully stressed segments, the usual Prager-Shield cost-gradient condition is used; and for understressed segments, a criterion proposed originally in the context of elastic beams with a deflection constraint, by Barnett and Shield and Prager is used. This foregoing results appear logical if it is realized that kinematic boundary conditions can be expressed as deflection constraints, and optimal elastic structures without hinges must use their understressed segments for rectifying the kinematic inadmissibility of the fully stressed design.
Subject Headings: Plastic design | Elastic analysis | Allowable stress design | Beams | Hinges | Kinematics | Elastoplasticity | Structural strength
Services: Buy this book/Buy this article
Return to search